LETTERS
Eminently wrongheaded
I read with interest the recent article about eminent domain
(Today's Farmer June/July 2005). It explained the legal process in determining
compensation for the taking of property
well, but completely overlooked the fact that there is no compensation
for the emotional component of the loss.
I will soon be facing condemnation of my farm, which has
been farmed by my family for 100 years next year, as well as my home, which was
built by my grandfather in 1913. Other farm owners in this area are facing
similar situations. The condemnation will likely be done by the county
(Carroll) for a power company who wants to use at least 2,000 acres of good
farm ground to build a coal-fired power plant to produce electricity for south
Missouri and northeast Oklahoma.
As far as I am concerned, there is really no just
compensation for the loss of a substantial part of my income and my family
home, not to mention my place in this community and a good and honest renter
who is also a friend. I can live elsewhere, but the view out of my kitchen
window will be lost forever. I can reinvest in farm ground in another part of
the state, but not "know the land" as I do here. Those and other intangible
losses that I will suffer unwillingly are not even considered.
There are other less personal reasons for not wanting my
land to be condemned. One is that clean agricultural resources are being traded
for the dirtiest form of energy in existence, most of which
won't benefit local residents. In this era of environmental consciousness, that
seems almost sacrilegious.
Grace West
Norborne, Mo.
Editor's note:
Emotional attachment is one of the reasons eminent domain is
necessary. Rural landowners probably have more sense of place than urban
landowners, and farmers in particular are more emotionally tied to their land.
Unfortunately, there is no good price discovery for emotions. Would you take
$50 million to move off the home place? Some would, some wouldn't. The agency
invoking eminent domain, then, is left with few options but to make payments
based on current market prices. What's worse is that property is more at risk
given recent events. As you have heard by now, the Supreme Court delivered its
decision on Kelo vs. City of New London. Bad news for land rightsÑit was a 5-4
ruling in favor of the state. The ruling means that the homes standing in the
way of private development can be condemned under the guise of economic
development. The ruling opens the way for true eminent domain chicanery.-SF
Blessing and curse
Ask any gardener-when the fruit and vegetables begin to
ripen, wildlife will come to celebrate the occasion. Most gardeners do not mind
sharing a little of their bounty with wildlife, but sometimes they share more
than they would like.
I always planted more tomatoes than I hoped to harvest due
to the loss of fruit to wildlife.
What gardeners face in loss to wild-life is miniscule in
comparison to what farmers and ranchers lose to wildlife in crops and
livestock. According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service, wildlife
causes nearly $950 million in damage to crops and livestock annually.
With the deer population growing rapidly, grain farmers are
losing larger percentages of their crops-two-thirds of the wildlife damage
occurs to farmers' grain crops. Livestock and poultry farmers lose more than
$175 million mostly to coyotes. And fruit, vegetable and nut producers lose
almost $150 million to wildlife.
Farmers and ranchers know they are going to lose crops and
livestock to insects and disease, to drought and floods, and to hail, wind and
lightning. It goes with the territory. Add to that $950 million in damage to
crops and livestock from wildlife-should that go with the territory too?
Denny Banister
Assistant director of public affairs
Missouri Farm Bureau
Jefferson City, Mo.
Time for animal ID
As you may know the Missouri Department of Agriculture is
urging Missouri livestock owners to register in the Missouri Animal
Identification Program (MAIP). The process is quick, easy to do, and available
by using a mail-in form (in this issue on page 31) or by going on-line to
www.mda.mo.gov.
The information requested is basic and limited and also
confidential. The registrant will soon thereafter receive by mail a card
containing the number for their premises.
This premises identification number will be a vital piece in
a future animal disease trace back system. In that system, animals and
locations will be identified in a database that will allow animal health
officials, if need be, to rapidly determine where an animal has been throughout
its production and marketing life as well as what other animals it had come in
contact with.
This information will be vital in stopping an epidemic in
the earliest stages possible, thereby protecting our abundant food supply-food
supply that is increasingly important here at home as well as around the world.
As a state that is among the leaders in many areas of
agriculture production, I would hope that again Missouri could lead the way in
this important new program. It's a program whose time has come.
Dr. Steve Goff
Administrator
Missouri Animal Identification Program
Jefferson City, Mo.
|