MFA OIL
Comparing synthetic and conventional oil
By Don North
Since manufacturers and users are always looking for
superior products that extend equipment life, the practice of analyzing used
oil has been around since engine lubricants were first introduced. Laboratories
that perform oil analysis on the many lubricant brands and formulations have
been vital to the development of new products.
Prior to the 1970s, conventional motor oils contained low
grades of base oils and low levels of additives and lacked in performance and
long drain intervals.
But a lot was happening in the automotive, fuel and
lubricant industry in the 70s. Higher fuel prices were common, unleaded
gasoline was mandated and engines with emission systems were introduced. The
EPA started to demand automobiles with cleaner running engines and longer oil
drain intervals, and soon after that, the American Petroleum Institute (API)
began working with automakers to develop higher standards for engine
lubricants. About the same time, Mobil introduced Mobil 1, a fully synthetic
engine oil that offered benefits over conventional oils of the time.
More than 30 years later, conventional oils are not the
same. Using high-quality base oils and the latest additive technology, today's
conventional engine oils offer:
-Low
temperature start-up and performance
-Resistance
to high temperature
-Better
wear protection
-Deposit
protection
-Extended
drain intervals
-Energy
conservation
The most current API service classification for gasoline
engines is SM, GF-4. The service classification for diesel engines is CI-4
plus. Products with these classifications meet just about all engine
manufacturer performance levels.
Oil analysis technicians frequently are asked whether
synthetic lubricants outperform conventional or mineral base oils. There is no
definitive answer to that question.
By definition, a synthetic lubricant is "a lubricating fluid
made by chemically reacting materials of a specific chemical composition to
produce a compound with planned and predictable properties." Its key benefit is
the ability to resist changes in viscosity in low temperature performance and
high temperature oxidation stability. This means synthetic oil stays in
viscosity grade for a longer drain interval than conventional oil.
Oil analysis considers three main components: machine wear,
contaminants and lubricant condition. There are several factors examined in
each category. Even so, it is difficult to identify a significant benefit of
synthetic over conventional oil when performing an analysis.
Current conventional oils perform very well. The oil drain
of synthetic and conventional oil is based more on contaminant level in used
oil than time or mileage. An important function of oil is to hold contaminants
in suspension, as many contaminant particles are too small for oil filters to
remove.
There is a clear advantage to synthetic lubricants in many
industrial lubricant applications. Gear boxes and drive trains that are not
exposed to contaminant-like combustion gases may see extended drain capability
with a synthetic lubricant.
Servicing engines within the manufacturer's oil drain
recommendations is important, and extended drain intervals should be
accompanied with close monitoring from an oil analysis program. Working closely
with a good lubricants company that knows the original equipment manufacturer
recommendations—and has an oil analysis program—can help you
determine any advantages of synthetic oil over conventional oil.
Don North directs product development and lubricant sales at
MFA Oil.
|