LIVESTOCK REPORT
By Glenn Grimes

CATTLE

Cow slaughter in 2006 through May 13 was up 2.5 percent from this period of 2005. The increase was in beef cow slaughter, which was up 8.8 percent. Dairy cow slaughter through May 13 was down 2.7 percent compared to these months of 2005.

 

For the 4-week period ending May 13 beef cow slaughter was up 17.4 percent from a year ago. There is a good chance this larger beef cow slaughter was due to the dry weather in western Texas and Oklahoma. Nearly 24 percent of the U.S. beef cow herd is located in Texas and Oklahoma.

 

We still believe the U.S. cow herd will be increased some in 2006 unless there is a severe drought over a significant portion of beef cow country.

Our beef demand index for January to April was down 2 percent from a year ago. This loss follows about a 1.5 percent decline between these

4 months of 2004 and 2005. We believe these losses are due to the decline in popularity of high protein diets and an increase in competing meat supplies.

 

The good news is that our demand index for live fed cattle was up 4.7 percent in January to April. This increase was fueled by narrower marketing margins. The total beef marketing margin for January to April 2006 was down nearly 4 percent from 12 months ago. The processor/retailer margin was down nearly 6 percent but the packer margin was up 7 percent compared to a year earlier. Even with the increase in margin, packers on average still experienced red ink for the period.

By late May, feeder cattle prices were down from the highs of 2005 but were still good. In late May 400 to 500 lb. medium and large frame No. 1 steer calves were selling at Oklahoma City for $125 to $149 per cwt. Seven to eight weight yearlings were selling from $102 to $111 per cwt.

 

Retail beef prices in April 2006 were down 5.5 percent from a year earlier and retail choice beef prices for January to April were down 3.1 percent compared to a year ago. The lower beef prices were due to larger supplies of beef, the reduction in beef demand, and larger supplies of competing meats—especially poultry.

 

Beef exports for January to March 2006 were up 72 percent from a year ago. However, beef exports were still 62 percent below 2003 before the cow with BSE was found in Washington state. Beef imports for the first three months of 2006 were up 1.4 percent from a year ago. Live feeder cattle imports from Mexico were up 9.1 percent for the January to March period and total cattle imports were up 111 percent from the same months in 2005. Our border did not open to live cattle from Canada until July 2005.

 

Feeder cattle prices are expected to continue relatively strong for the summer and fed cattle prices are likely to be in the upper $70s in August 2006. Certainly near-normal rainfall levels will be very important to feeder cattle prices.

 

SWINE

The bright spot for the hog industry is pork exports. For January to March 2006 pork exports were up 22.2 percent from this period of 2005. Remember, pork exports in both 2004 and 2005 were up over 20 percent from the prior year. Pork exports for the first quarter of 2006 were 86 percent higher the first quarter of 2003.

 

Several factors have contributed to these larger pork exports. Producers can take credit for at least a portion of the increase. They have improved

the quality of pork to meet the specifications of importing countries and during the last 20 years they have provided about $55 million to promote U.S. pork exports.

 

Our hog industry is probably about 16 percent larger in 2006 than it would have been if pork exports were still at the 1986 level.  In addition to increasing the size of the industry, pork exports have added over $6.3 billion to producersŐ incomes over the last 20 years.

 

About 14.5 percent of U.S. pork production during the first 3 months of 2006 was exported. The possible downside to this level of exports is that a disease outbreak in the United States could stop all exports and hog prices would likely be cut in half. Certainly we hope this never happens, but it is always a possibility.

 

Pork demand at the consumer level is not performing very well in 2006. For January to April consumer demand for pork was down 6.2 percent from last year. This loss in demand is probably mostly due to the decline in the popularity of the high protein diets and larger supplies of competing meats, especially poultry.

 

The good news is that live hog demand was down less than 4 percent for January to April 2006 compared to last year. This smaller drop in live hog demand than consumer demand can be explained by the increase in pork exports and population growth.

 

As of April 2006, the average cost producer has made money for 27 consecutive months according to Iowa State University. With normal crop production, these profits are expected to continue at least through September. Hog producers, on average, may be in the best financial condition they have ever been.

 

ProducersŐ profits are likely to disappear in the fourth quarter of this year and red ink on average is expected for 2007. More pork and higher feed costs are expected to be the major factors in reducing profitability for the industry. This period of red ink is likely to last for quite some time unless demand growth rescues the industry as it did in 2004. Demand growth is possible but not likely.

 

Demand for feeder pigs continued quite strong into late spring but prices will be lower in the last half of 2006 because of lower slaughter hog prices and possibly higher feed prices.